Which site did you use to answer these questions? Why did you select it? (Why did you believe this would be the more credible, accurate and relevant site?)
Breaking it Down
The scientific method is the process scientists use to explore the world around us and predict how it works. The process is ongoing and never-ending. Scientists use the scientific method to develop better, more useful hypotheses about how things function. A hypothesis is an explanation of an observation or experimental result that can be tested.
When using the scientific method, you follow these general steps:
1. Observation: You see, hear, smell, taste, feel or calculate something. While working on your assignment on the computer, you suddenly see that the monitor turns black and you hear no noise from the computer unit.
2. Question: What is wrong with the computer and its monitor?
3. Hypothesis: The power went out.
Note: Many times scientists come up with more than one hypothesis right away. In this case, another one could be: The computer crashed.
4. Prediction: If the power went out, then the lights should not work either.
5. Test: Turn on a light in the house to find out whether it works.
6. Conclusion: Was the hypothesis supported or disproved?
The test will either support your hypothesis because the lights do not work or the test will not support your hypothesis because the lights do work, and you will have to modify your hypothesis or come up with a completely new one.
Q2. Your uncle Jim makes a salad dressing that you really like. After Sunday's dinner he gives you a bottle with some of the dressing to take home to use during the following week. When you take the bottle out of the fridge next day, you see that there are different layers of fluid. Your first instinct is to call uncle Jim and ask him whether the dressing went bad. However, you remember reviewing the scientific method and want to use it to find out what happened to the dressing.
Write out each of the 6 steps above applying the scientific method to this observation.
Q3. Your friend, Barbara, tells you she is using a new fertilizer on her roses. She believes this new fertilizer, "Mega Rose", is making her roses grow faster and flower more than your roses. How could you use the scientific method to decide if you should start using "Mega Rose" on your roses, too?
Write out each of the 6 steps above applying the scientific method to this observation.
When a specific observation (in our case that the computer monitor went black) leads to a general hypothesis, we call this inductive reasoning. Think of inductive reasoning as little to big. Many little (or specific) facts lead to a big (or general) principle.
Credit: Jeremy Vandel
Credit: Joost J.Bakker IJmuiden
Credit: Kristine Paulus
This ladybug has six legs; This grasshopper has six legs; This firefly has six legs. →So do all insects have 6 legs?
When the general hypothesis leads to specific predictions (in our case, if the power is out the lights may not work either), we call this deductive reasoning. Think of deductive reasoning as big to little. One big (general) principle leads to many little (specific) predictions.
So, using deductive reasoning:
- I know that adult insects have six legs, therefore:
- I bet if I go into the yard and catch a ladybug, it will have six legs.
- If I catch a grasshopper, I bet it will have six legs.
- If I catch a firefly, I bet it will have six legs, too.
Here's a trick to help you remember which is which:
Inductive is Increasing (little to big)Notice that the scientific method uses both kinds of reasoning. Inductive reasoning is used when you take the specific observations and make a general hypothesis. Then deductive reasoning is used when you figure out a way to test that hypothesis. Then inductive reasoning is used again when you gather the data from your test and use it to make a conclusion about your hypothesis.
Deductive is Decreasing (big to little)
Although science uses both types of reasoning, it relies much more heavily on inductive reasoning. Notice that the scientific method always starts with an observation. You see, hear, smell, touch, taste, or calculate something. The scientific method never starts with a principle; it only develops a principle (called a theory in science) after much observation and hypothesis testing.
Ideally, scientific experiments never try to prove that a theory is correct, they seek to show the theory is incorrect, or disprove the theory. Whenever this happens (and it happens very frequently), the experiment must be repeated. Other labs and scientists try to reproduce the experiment, also. If numerous labs are able to reproduce the experiment that disproved the theory it is usually modified to account for the new data (or observations), or it could be thrown out completely (and possibly be replaced).
|There are other fields of knowledge that use deductive reasoning more heavily. Subjects such as philosophy, literature, art, and religion begin with widely accepted principles and deduce specifics from there. For example: "You shall not steal" is a principle (big) and we may use it to guide a specific decision (little) about whether to stop at the checkout counter and pay before we leave a store with something. These are great ways to develop, enjoy, and guide our lives as whole human beings. They are no less important than science, they just approach knowledge differently. |
Q4. Give one example that is not found in the lesson for each:
a.) inductive reasoning
A hypothesis that is repeatedly tested and verified is strengthened, in particular, if the tests are done by different scientists. However, billions of positive tests still do not verify the hypothesis. But, a single repeatable failure of the test can prove the hypothesis false (disprove the hypothesis).
b.) deductive reasoning
Scientists are constantly applying new technology (something we will discuss in a later lesson) to their studies. Sometimes, these new technologies allow scientists to conduct experiments (tests) previously impossible. Armed with better equipment and techniques it is not uncommon to disprove a hypothesis.
A theory is a hypothesis that has been scientifically acknowledged to explain phenomena and observations. It is usually not a static construct but undergoes cycles of modifications as new ways of testing are developed.
A scientific principle or law is a theory that has resulted in true predictions over an extended time and is almost universally accepted. However, these principles are sometimes still referred to as theories. Even gravity is sometimes referred to as a theory in scientific lingo.
Q5. Find out about one theory in physics and one theory in chemistry and report your findings here.
Q6. Find out about one scientific principle or law in physics and one scientific principle or law in chemistry and report your findings here.
Falsifiability is one of the important principles of science. Falsifiability is the logical possibility that something can be disproven. A question must be falsifiable to fall into the realm of scientific inquiry. Lets look at these two general principles:
1. Gravity is a property of all matter.
2. Leos are charismatic leaders.
In order to be studied by science, a principle must be falsifiable. Which of these is falsifiable? For the first statement, if any matter did not behave according to the theory of gravity by showing an attraction to other matter, then the principle of gravity would need to be modified. (Physicists are in the process right now of dealing with this issue as they try to figure out the properties of "dark matter.") So yes this is falsifiable. It can be found out to be false.
On the other hand, if a person born under the sign of Leo, between July 23 and August 22, was not a charismatic leader, the situation is handled differently. Instead of saying, "Well, maybe this principle isn't quite right; how can we fix it?" an astrologer would say "Well, just because you think that you are not a charismatic leader does not mean that Leos are not charismatic leaders. It means you are suppressing your natural leadership abilities." This could possibly be true about someone, and it's interesting to think about. But no matter how many observations contradicted the principle that Leos are charismatic leaders, it would not prove the principle false. This means that number 2 is NOT falsifiable. Therefore, it does not count as science. Figuring out whether or not it is true is none of our business in science, even when it has to do with the movement of planets.
NOTE: That something is "falsifiable" does not mean it is false; rather, it means that if the statement were false, we could show that it was false.
Q7. Come up with your own examples of a falsifiable statement and a non-falsifiable statement. For each one, explain how it can or cannot be proven false.
Q8. Find out what is meant by the term pseudo-science and give an example not found in this lesson.
Recall step 5 in the scientific method. In step 5, we test our hypothesis and prediction. There are several ways to do this, and the correct way depends on the question being asked and the specific scientific discipline we are working in. In social sciences, a survey might be a good way to test a hypothesis. In physics, we might run a computer simulation or work a mathematical equation to test a hypothesis. In biology or chemistry we might perform an experiment.
Sometimes the word experiment is used in everyday life to simply mean "to try something." However, we will find throughout this class that the scientific meaning of certain words is sometimes a little bit, or a lot, different from the everyday meaning. In science, an experiment is a very specific way to test a hypothesis. In an experiment, we want to know if a change happens, and we want to be sure we can identify what caused a change to happen. To do this we isolate a variable we are interested in, make a difference to that variable while keeping other variables the same, and see what changes as a result of that difference. Click on this link to learn more about scientific experiments. The following graphic may help you organize how to plan for an experiment.
Putting the Steps Together
Observation: When I go outside, I noticed that on different nights and times crickets chirp at different rates (the frequency of their chirps changes).
Question: Is there a factor that affects the chirping rate of crickets?
Hypothesis: After reading some reference books and searching on the internet I believe that air temperature may be affecting the rate at which the crickets chirp. My hypothesis will be, "If air temperature is increased, the rate that a cricket chirps will increase."
Prediction: If I measure the rate at which crickets chirp at night, the rate will vary with temperature. The rate at which crickets chirp and the temperature will be directly proportional (we will learn about direct proportion in Lesson 3 - Data Analysis).
Independent variable: Temperature
Dependent variable: Rate at which crickets chirp
Atmospheric pressure - 760 mm
Wind speed - 2 m/sec
Humidity - 15 %
Access to weather data
Crickets in an area/environment where they can be observed
Check the current weather on the Weather Channel or internet. Record the air pressure, relative humidity, wind speed and humidity.
If the control variables are each within 10% of their target locate a cricket and record the number of chirps the cricket makes in 1 minute and record this measurement (along with the temperature) in a table. Repeat at least three times (three trials).
Conclusion: Was your hypothesis supported or disproved?
Q9. Janice has a geranium in a flowerpot, and after a while it dies. Janice thinks, "I wonder if it is because of the type of potting soil I used?" So she goes to the store and buys a new geranium and a different type of potting soil to plant it in. She also waters this new geranium every other day and is careful not to forget about it like she did before. After the plant survives for one year, Janice decides that her experiment proved that this new brand of potting soil is excellent and recommends it to all her friends. Use the information in the link above and:
Explain why Janice's experiment is actually NOT good enough to make the interpretation that she made?
Help Janice out by designing an experiment for her. Include all steps of the scientific method and the information on the link above. Be sure to specifically list all your variables and which type each is.
Q10. What is a "control group"? Why does an experiment need to have a control group? (Hint: Look in the link above.)
Use the knowledge you have gained from this lesson as a basis for further investigation. Use your logic, or do some additional research to answer the following questions:
Q11. You may have learned that insects have six legs. If you spend the rest of your life catching bugs and counting their legs, will you ever find one that does not have six legs? Explain your answer.
Q12. Do some research to find out what the difference is between experiment data and experiment result. Please, explain your answer including an example. (Don't forget to site your source!)
Q13. Select one of the following hypotheses.
- If air pressure is lowered then water will boil at a lower temperature.
- If you apply a constant force, an object with smaller mass will accelerate more than an object with a larger mass.
- If you increase the temperature of a cup of water, more sugar will dissolve in it.
- If salt is added to tap water it will boil at a higher temperature.
Apply the scientific method (write out each of the six steps) to the hypothesis you selected. Design a test (experiment) for your hypothesis remembering to list your variables, steps, materials and plan for data.
Note: For this class it is necessary to post the questions over each answer. Failure to do so will result in being asked for a revision.
To get a 10: All answers are correct, thorough, and clearly written/drawn within 2 revisions. All writing is grammatically correct and all lesson requirements have been met.
To get a 9: In 3 revisions, all answers are correct, thorough, and clearly written/drawn. All writing is grammatically correct and all lesson requirements have been met.
To get an 8: In 4 revisions, all answers are correct, thorough, and clearly written/drawn. All writing is grammatically correct and all lesson requirements have been met. -OR- In 2 revisions, 4 or fewer minor grammatical errors remain (missing commas, typos, or other mistakes that do not impede clarity)
To get a 7: In 5 revisions, all answers are correct, thorough, and clearly written/drawn. All writing is grammatically correct and all lesson requirements have been met. -OR- In 3 revisions, 4 or fewer minor grammatical errors remain (missing commas, typos, or other mistakes that do not impede clarity)
To get a 6: In unlimited revisions, all answers are correct, thorough, and clearly written/drawn. All writing is grammatically correct and all lesson requirements have been met.
To get a 5: Plagiarism - purposeful or mistaken, which will lower your final grade for the course (so be very careful when posting your work!); lack of effort, disrespect, or attitude (we are here to communicate with you if you don't understand something); lesson requirements have been met.
No grade will be given for incomplete work.
Copy and paste all of the questions in the lesson above into the text box below. Below each question, answer it in complete, grammatically correct sentences.Do not submit text that you have copied from sources, including websites. All of your work should be in your own words. Using copied text would be considered plagiarism. For more information, review our page on Plagiarism and Citation. When citing your sources, be sure to use the full proper citation format as described in Plagiarism and Citation.
Materials on this page are © Compuhigh unless otherwise noted, and may not be reused without express written permission.